0.12/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1920 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 240 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 02:53:04 EDT 2025 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yp18SxFozB/E---3.1_22923.p 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_8 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # new_bool_9 with pid 23003 completed with status 0 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_9 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0) 0.19/0.49 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF21-SSSFFMBN 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF21-SSSFFMBN 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 23010 completed with status 10 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_9 with 25s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # new_bool_9 with pid 23017 completed with status 0 0.19/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_9 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0) 0.19/0.50 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF21-SSSFFMBN 0.19/0.50 # partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF21-SSSFFMBN 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 23010 completed with status 10 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_9 with 25s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # Proof found! 0.19/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_sort1, type, c: $tType). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_sort2, type, b: $tType). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_sort3, type, a: $tType). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_23, type, c_starc: c > c > c). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_24, type, c_starb: b > b > b). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, c_stara: a > a > a). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: a > b). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: a > c). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: b > c). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_29, type, esk4_1: b > a). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_30, type, esk5_0: b). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_31, type, esk6_0: b). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_32, type, epred1_0: c > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(cTHM270_INST, conjecture, ![X1:a > b, X2:a > c, X3:b > c]:((![X4:b, X5:b, X6:c > $o]:(((X6 @ (X3 @ (c_starb @ X4 @ X5)))=>(X6 @ (c_starc @ (X3 @ X4) @ (X3 @ X5)))))<=(((![X5:b]:(?[X7:a]:(![X8:b > $o]:(((X8 @ (X1 @ X7))=>(X8 @ X5)))))&![X9:a, X10:a, X11:b > $o]:(((X11 @ (X1 @ (c_stara @ X9 @ X10)))=>(X11 @ (c_starb @ (X1 @ X9) @ (X1 @ X10))))))&![X12:a, X13:a, X6:c > $o]:(((X6 @ (X2 @ (c_stara @ X12 @ X13)))=>(X6 @ (c_starc @ (X2 @ X12) @ (X2 @ X13))))))&![X14:a, X6:c > $o]:(((X6 @ (X2 @ X14))<=(X6 @ (X3 @ (X1 @ X14)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yp18SxFozB/E---3.1_22923.p', cTHM270_INST)). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > b, X2:a > c, X3:b > c]:(((((![X5:b]:(?[X7:a]:(![X8:b > $o]:(((X8 @ (X1 @ X7))=>(X8 @ X5)))))&![X9:a, X10:a, X11:b > $o]:(((X11 @ (X1 @ (c_stara @ X9 @ X10)))=>(X11 @ (c_starb @ (X1 @ X9) @ (X1 @ X10))))))&![X12:a, X13:a, X6:c > $o]:(((X6 @ (X2 @ (c_stara @ X12 @ X13)))=>(X6 @ (c_starc @ (X2 @ X12) @ (X2 @ X13))))))&![X14:a, X6:c > $o]:(((X6 @ (X3 @ (X1 @ X14)))=>(X6 @ (X2 @ X14)))))=>![X4:b, X5:b, X6:c > $o]:(((X6 @ (X3 @ (c_starb @ X4 @ X5)))=>(X6 @ (c_starc @ (X3 @ X4) @ (X3 @ X5)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM270_INST])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X35:b, X37:b > $o, X38:a, X39:a, X40:b > $o, X41:a, X42:a, X43:c > $o, X44:a, X45:c > $o]:((((((~(X37 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X35)))|(X37 @ X35))&(~(X40 @ (esk1_0 @ (c_stara @ X38 @ X39)))|(X40 @ (c_starb @ (esk1_0 @ X38) @ (esk1_0 @ X39)))))&(~(X43 @ (esk2_0 @ (c_stara @ X41 @ X42)))|(X43 @ (c_starc @ (esk2_0 @ X41) @ (esk2_0 @ X42)))))&(~(X45 @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X44)))|(X45 @ (esk2_0 @ X44))))&((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ (c_starb @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)))&~(epred1_0 @ (c_starc @ (esk3_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_0 @ esk6_0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X6:c > $o, X7:a]:(((X6 @ (esk2_0 @ X7))|~((X6 @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X7)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X8:b > $o, X4:b]:(((X8 @ X4)|~((X8 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X4)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a, X8:b > $o, X9:a]:(((X8 @ (c_starb @ (esk1_0 @ X7) @ (esk1_0 @ X9)))|~((X8 @ (esk1_0 @ (c_stara @ X7 @ X9)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X6:c > $o, X7:a, X9:a]:(((X6 @ (c_starc @ (esk2_0 @ X7) @ (esk2_0 @ X9)))|~((X6 @ (esk2_0 @ (c_stara @ X7 @ X9)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a]:(((esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X7))=(esk2_0 @ X7))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_3])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X4:b]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X4))=(X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_4])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a, X9:a]:(((c_starb @ (esk1_0 @ X7) @ (esk1_0 @ X9))=(esk1_0 @ (c_stara @ X7 @ X9)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_5])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a, X9:a]:(((c_starc @ (esk2_0 @ X7) @ (esk2_0 @ X9))=(esk2_0 @ (c_stara @ X7 @ X9)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_6])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:b]:(((esk2_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X4))=(esk3_0 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a, X4:b]:(((esk1_0 @ (c_stara @ X7 @ (esk4_1 @ X4)))=(c_starb @ (esk1_0 @ X7) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a, X4:b]:(((esk2_0 @ (c_stara @ X7 @ (esk4_1 @ X4)))=(c_starc @ (esk2_0 @ X7) @ (esk3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a, X4:b]:(((c_starc @ (esk2_0 @ X7) @ (esk3_0 @ X4))=(esk3_0 @ (c_starb @ (esk1_0 @ X7) @ X4)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_12]), c_0_13])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (c_starc @ (esk3_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_0 @ esk6_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X4:b, X5:b]:(((c_starc @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))=(esk3_0 @ (c_starb @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_11]), c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ (c_starb @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 7 0.19/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses : 6 0.19/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6 0.19/0.50 # Processed clauses : 35 0.19/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 9 0.19/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 26 0.19/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.19/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 9 0.19/0.50 # Generated clauses : 61 0.19/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 49 0.19/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.50 # Paramodulations : 29 0.19/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.50 # NegExts : 0 0.19/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.19/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.19/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 32 0.19/0.50 # ...of those cached : 18 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 11 0.19/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11 0.19/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.19/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.19/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20 0.19/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 29 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 15 0.19/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6 0.19/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.19/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.19/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 7 0.19/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.19/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2712 0.19/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 404 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.010 s 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.010 s 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.014 s 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages 0.19/0.50 % E exiting 0.19/0.50 % E exiting 0.19/0.50 EOF